Tool inventory
Track every AI recruiting vendor, model version, hiring stage, owner, geography, and audit date before the tool is used at scale.
AI hiring bias audit and compliance report generator
Run a live adverse-impact preview across AI resume screens, video interviews, and assessments. HireBias Audit turns protected-group pass rates into 4/5 rule flags, risk scores, and a report draft your compliance team can review.
Why buyers convert
HireBias Audit is shaped for HR compliance, legal review, and vendor governance. It keeps the workflow focused on applicant-flow math, bias audit documentation, and actions that reduce exposure.
Track every AI recruiting vendor, model version, hiring stage, owner, geography, and audit date before the tool is used at scale.
Calculate selection rates and impact ratios for protected groups across resume screens, interview scoring, and assessments.
Export a report packet with methodology, scope, risk matrix, flagged cells, limitations, and remediation decisions.
Remediation loop
Every flagged ratio connects to a remediation path: threshold review, balanced validation data, manual review checkpoints, candidate notice review, vendor questions, or counsel escalation.
Plans
Annual plans are 50% lower than paying month to month. Compliance is preselected for quarterly monitoring and mid-market review cadence.
For a single annual AI hiring bias audit before a vendor renewal or policy review.
$1,200 billed yearly. Save 50%.
100-500 employees
For mid-market teams that need quarterly monitoring and cleaner board-ready evidence.
$3,600 billed yearly. Save 50%.
500-2,000 employees
For legal, HR, and procurement teams running a formal AI employment decision program.
$9,000 billed yearly. Save 50%.
2,000+ employees
Useful compliance paths
Questions legal and HR ask first
No. HireBias Audit provides software, calculations, documentation support, and workflow evidence. Employers should review legal conclusions with qualified counsel.
Vendor reports are useful inputs, but employers often need employer-specific data, workflow scope, tool usage context, and documented remediation decisions.
Most mid-market employers need more than one annual snapshot. Quarterly monitoring catches threshold, model, and hiring-stage changes before the next formal review.